John Keegan is the best historian that I have read
-- and I’ve read a few. His The Face of Battle is a remarkable book;
I’ve read it four or five times, and each time I return to it I find new depth
in it, new understanding of the factors that affect human behavior on the field
of fire. Don’t call what Keegan practices "military history,"
either: he draws on a broad and deep mastery of world history, the humanities,
and the liberal arts to illuminate his subjects.
Speaking of history: have you read Daniel
Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners? It is a very controversial
book: Goldhagen hammers home his thesis without compromise, citing instance
after instance of ordinary German citizens cheerfully tormenting, torturing, and
murdering their Jewish neighbors in the 1920s, 30s, and during World War II.
Critics of the book say that Goldhagen is too single-minded in condemning the
German people as a whole, and perhaps they are right. But the weight of his
evidence is powerful, and I believe that he has obsoleted the arguments of
previous analysts of the Holocaust, who often tried to explain unspeakable acts
by reference to complicated theories of the behavior of masses and other
psychosocial exegeses. It seems to me that that stuff just won’t do now.
Recently I’ve been reading a lot about John
Brown. Oates’s biography of him
is pretty good; Russell Banks’s novelization is even better (I still
haven’t read a biography as good as Huey Long, by T. Harry Williams).
Recently I’ve been doing some research online about Brown and other
people and themes in his time as part of my work for a project at Assumption
College called E Pluribus Unum (www.assumption.edu/ahc).
Take a look at the site, and follow some of the internal and external links.
This is, in my prejudiced opinion, good history.
The web site is being created by John McClymer and Lucia Knoles at
Assumption. McClymer and Knoles are
two smart scholars whose knowledge of U.S. History is matched only by their
excellent work at integrating online skills and content seamlessly into their
research and classes.
Wait, I'm not done yet.
Bernard Bailyn is the best practitioner of U.S. history that I know of. I
think Gordon Wood’s work is terrific, too. I’ve been away from academic
contact with the field for so long; I know there are dozens of excellent
historians totally unknown to me who are doing great work. And Daniel Boorstin
is so entertaining, so perceptive with just the right observation about the
perfect little detail, that he just captivates the reader. He almost gets you
to swallow his conservative agenda without the slightest bit of pain –
almost.